Sorry, this article is only available in Русский.
 |
 |
UDC 316.613
PEARL STRING FALLACY AND LIVING RELIGION
Stavropolsky Yuliy Vladimirovich
Saratov State University named after N. G. Chernyshevsky
Ph. D. (Sociology), Associate Professor of the General & Social Psychology Department
Saratov State University named after N. G. Chernyshevsky
Ph. D. (Sociology), Associate Professor of the General & Social Psychology Department
Abstract
Living religion as opposite to the philosophy’s timelessness compels us consider the interrelations between religious and political institutions, doctrines and rites mediated by the religious lives of the actual people. Peculiarly since the sources’ range has expanded including the popular references, rite manuals, rural residents’ diaries, government registers, and stone signposts one should integrate a triad of ideas, institutions, and rituals. Priority should be given to the study of Buddhists rather than the study of Buddhism. In more sophisticated terms one should study human lives as compliments to the ideas which drove them. Meanwhile the people located in the center of research are by no means supernatural nor superordinate monks registered in the annals of the Zen history.
Keywords: history, Japan, practice, rite, temple, Tokugawa, Zen
Category: Common rubric
Article reference:
Pearl string fallacy and living religion // Psychology, sociology and pedagogy. 2016. № 11 [Electronic journal]. URL: https://psychology.snauka.ru/en/2016/11/7452
View this article in Russian
© If you have found a violation of copyrights please notify us immediately by e-mail or feedback form.
Contact author (comments/reviews)
Write comment
You must authorise to write a comment.
Если Вы еще не зарегистрированы на сайте, то Вам необходимо зарегистрироваться: